By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
curl-6 said:

captain carot said:

I'd mostly agree here but still call them bad games. I think one should be able to recognize qualities even if one dislikes the game.

Basically that's my big problem with Star Fox Zero, i see to few qualities at all with way to big flaws. Wind Waker and Majoras Mask are two different stories though. Both games have their qualities and a relatively high standard, even if there's stuff that i really dislike.

But everyone should be free to have an own opinion

Wind Waker and Majora do have their positive qualities, (WW's music, Majora's graphics by N64 standards) I just feel that the negatives outweighed the good.

I'm totally fine with your opinion. I just find that 'bad/great' with zero differentiation extremely tiring. I totally understand why people dislike Super Mario 3D World, though i personally liked it for being a 'classic' platformer instead of the more action-adventure like 3D platforming games. It's not a bad game actually, but one you might dislike. Again, differantiation should be possible.

 

Not having played Metroid Prime Federation Force, Star Fox Zero is one of the very few cases where a Nintendo game can really be called bad by meaning of word. And the one case where i really can't understand positive reviews at all.