By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
palou said:

I'll give you a call, haha!

 

But seriously, it *is* a bit annoying to hear people with no qualification whatsoever pretend to know all the flaws of theories conceived upon years and years of dedicated work from all the most knowledgeable individuals on a subject. Yes, there is stuff that's debatable, no, you have nothing of value to contribute to that debate.

And none of are retail sales analysts either.  Pardon us for engaging in debate outside of our personal areas of expertise.

But for the very least, we can all see the link between higher numbers on amazon, and higher consequent sales numbers. We know what a supply shortage is. You know what console is, you know what a game is, you know pretty much exactly why someone would want either of them, and have personal experience with it. An expert could give more *precise* predictions, surely, with higher chances of accuracy, but you can make an approximation, which you do for yourself, which is fine. 

 

The topic at debate here is about as abstract as it gets. You're using words that you almost certainly don't understand (I surely would never claim to in a thousand years) and making conclusions off of them, judging work that took decades of the highest expertise to conceive with dubious conclusions you've made in the last hour on terms so oversimplified they contain none of the information that resulted in the construction of the theories.



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.