By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArchangelMadzz said:
WolfpackN64 said:

Indeed, he can act as a mover additionally when he wants, but his action is not necessary for our own actions directly.

But I've just made that up. 

This argument is meaningless because you can keep adding things and your own definitions and ideas because this isn't based on any evidence or observations. As someone said it's circular reasoning that can go on forever.

Why is A like this? 
Because of B.
Then why is B like this?
Because of A.

etc.

Probably because we're not communicating clearly. I didn't state anything here that I didn't state earlier or that wasn't encompassed by the original theory. I merely stated a possible affect, I didn't add anything to the argument.