Nuvendil on 07 January 2018
curl-6 said:
I dunno, I think X had much better long range vistas tbh
|
On an aesthetic level perhaps, but on a technical level I think not. I think what hurts 2 is it has the anti-aliasing turned way up, which blurs some areas and softens the image, obscuring some details. X had very weak AA so thr blurriness was lessened.
But there is a change in philosophy in 2. Upclose detail got the bulk of the upgrade whereas X put high emphasis on the distant vistas. Which makes sense with X being seamless and 2 being segmented.
Last edited by Nuvendil - on 07 January 2018
