By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said: 
ArchangelMadzz said:

That would be the case in the public square. But twitter is a private company, they are legally within their right to ban users for speech. The only thing they nor the government can do is arrest you for it. 

And again, those people are wrong if they're hypocritcal. Although I'd wonder what world I was living in if I saw Bernie tweeting like Trump though,or any leader of a first world country. I literally have to go on his twitter whenever I see a viral tweet of his just to make sure it's real and sadly 99% of the time it is.

I've seen homophobia, racism, sexism etc. I like in the UK I have 'chav's' on my facebook and others that are friends of friends that have written everything without any Ban. Writing about 'paki's' and muslims etc. Facebook are very lax when it comes to enforcing their rules. 

Have I said they aren't allowed to do it? I know they are a private corporation, that is even why I said they are free to not follow or enforce their ToS, I just said I'm against this part of it, simple as that.

May be a question of the bubble we leave within in facebook. But on my account I see a lot of those getting banned and "reverse racism" and manhating getting props and no ban.

I think it's a pretty good idea to have a rule against inciting hatred or violence against an individual for a social media company.

Well considering you spend your free time looking for people who aren't banned for certain things it's not odd that you'd pay more attention to those who aren't getting banned.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'