By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
ArchangelMadzz said:

No, you misunderstand and are adding words. where did I say that? 

If you think churchill would use his twitter to threaten violence upon other governments and their people then yes, he should under twitter guidelines be banned from the site. Other government leaders, and previous leaders before trump didn't use their twitters to continue tensions with foreign govnerments.
Why did I even have to explain that?  

And those people are wrong, the guidelines should be enforced on everyone.
Wait do you even use facebook? Because I see that going on everyday with no action. 

Errrrrr, Churchill and Eisenhower used radio to do war talk and that basically involved action and killing against other countries... but sure we are the generation that Trump threatening to torch some people is worse than Eisenhower dropping 2 nukes on a country...

Yes I do use facebook and am part of several groups where they monitor a lot of hate speechs done by "liberals" that get answers with not being against the policies but posts that use a specific word or another on subject involving minorities are hammered down...

Perhaps you need to break from your bubble on facebook.

And if they were tweeting their threats then they should be banned from Twitter too. You could've placed my response there on your own. 

Jeez that really shouldn't have surprised me but it did.. 

But again you're not actually reading what I'm saying. I said that I see hate speech all the time on Facebook without anything being done about it. Not that it doesn't happen. 



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'