Puppyroach said:
Yeah... no, most things in this book is likely true. Otherwise, Trump wouldn´t have tried to stop its publication. Bannon has not denied what he says in the book, the publication firm is confident in Wolffs material, Wolff also claim to have audio recordings and notes that can verify everything and the things mentioned are in many ways consistent with what was suspected of Trump. |
You guys don't really know this guy's history, do you? Yeah, he'll have to actually release those supposed audio recordings to have any credibility. He has a history of claiming he has recordings and then refusing to let anyone hear them:
http://www.businessinsider.com/accuracy-of-michael-wolffs-new-trump-book-in-question-2018-1?r=US&IR=T&IR=T
https://splinternews.com/remember-who-michael-wolff-is-1821749209
https://web.archive.org/web/20120718061524/http://www.brillscontent.com/burn.shtml
There's more than enough content to make fun of Trump for if you don't like him. Anchoring yourselves to this kind of source is only going to end in further disappointment. This tweet is also a funny indicator of how people believe literally anything about Trump, as long as it's against him. 
Disliking Trump is fine, and being critical of him is even better since you should be critical of your politicians. But have some sort of critique for the sources as well. Anyone who just believes everything bad about something ends up looking silly in the end.
