The Next Rosa Parks?

[Mr Puggsly]

ArchangelMadzz said:

Mr Puggsly said:

Well the thing is I cant control what gender I am, per se. Unless you believe in the gender is fluid thing...

So it becomes a legal issue when women can pay less simply for something people cant control. Where is the equality in that? Your argument is valid for why business do ladies night, but its not equality. Does a man claiming to be a woman pay less as well? Or does the bar decide radomly? That could be a potential lawsuit.

Haircutting business in the US like Great Clips and Super Cuts had flat prices for basic haircuts. But it was a few dollars more for women given their styles are more complex, time consuming, etc. But what if some lesbian wanted a basic haircut for a man? Obviously you should charge the male rate. And perhaps vice versa! So they settled with a flat rate. Which made a simple mens haircut kinda expenisve.

These are modern problems in a more inclusive world.

For that establishment yeah. 

You have no control over when you're born, yet children pay less to get into buffets. 
Is it a bit shitty that on a ladies night women pay less? Sure, but if someone doesn't like it then they don't have to support. But it's hardly a legal issue, It would be better if nothing like that ever existed in the first place as it would just make things simpler. Especially the whole trans argument of if identiying as a women counts etc

Your argument is weak because we all age. But things like gender amd etchnicity dont change, not REALLY. So maybe an argument could be made for age but its not equal.

Lower price for ethnicity would offend many. While gender is just business. So this is partly why ladies night is not as common.

I guess my feeling is these law laws should reach as far as people desire or we pull back regulations. Maybe let businesses do whatever they want regardless who it offends... But that wont happen.