RolStoppable said:
1. Sony couldn't pull off a hybrid because it would be a new concept and third parties would be skeptical as a result, moving towards Xbox where they get what they want. The PS1 was a straightforward home console; nothing about it was new. 2. Nintendo couldn't make a successful phone because the market is already too crowded in all price segments. The only selling point Nintendo could add would be games, but people don't buy phones to play games. The necessity for physical buttons would lead to compromises in the design of the phone which in turn would make it unattractive to pull it out in public spaces like other phones. Anyone who is looking for gaming on the go would stick with dedicated Nintendo handhelds due to superior hardware design and much better games. A Nintendo phone would inevitably be caught between pointless and not good enough. |
1. It's a likely scenario but not 100% exclusive option
2. That is thinking Nintendo would just make the same phone everyone makes. It isn't impossible that someone will make a device that will take the cell place.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







