By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aura7541 said:
JakDaSnack said:

Uh Wikipedia lol, and yes Wikipedia is legit.  It has ANH outperforming ESB by 150 million domestically, so your initial claim was wrong.  That’s great that you think you don’t have blinders, but if you objectively looked at your posts, you’d realize that you do.

Btw I had no predictions, I don’t make predictions.  And again you are adding to my argument, it was predicted to do 25% worse than TFA, it will probably end up only doing 100-200 million less than it was predicted....OH NO!!!!!! Sigh....movies don’t make consistently less than other movies from the beginning.....you act like going from 15% down to 30% is surprising....it’s not at all.  And there were more than 2 sequels out last year lol, and this isn’t an argument, this is a well known fact.  

Anyways, your bad excuses and hyperbole is getting tiresome, this will be my last post to you.  You have clearly been exaggerating the truth in order push your agenda.  See ya later.

Asserting that Wikipedia is a legit source is a grave mistake. You have to look at the source that Wikipedia is referencing in order to figure out if the figures are actually true. Whether you're right or wrong on this matter is irrelevant when your blind faith on a non-legit source perfectly fits your description of thismeintiel on your last paragraph.

You also did not address his other points like how other sequels have done better than their predecessors and yet, TLJ failed to perform better than TFA. Instead, you resort to ad hominem attacks. You already received a warning earlier in this thread, so I suggest that you cut the personal attacks out.

To be fair, and the ultimate decision is of course up to you, but I don't really see any attacks. I guess the blinders part, but meh...Though, I do completely disagree with his assertion that he has been attacked. We have all been arguing our points. We've gotten a little cocky at times, but nothing on the level of an attack.