Goodnightmoon said:
Bullshit, you only need to get rid of the 1s to have an average very close to 8, you don't need to get rid of everything below 4, and yes 9s and 10s are totally normal when the most popular score of the people are 8s, there is nothing strange about a 9 when most people give the movie an 8, however a 1 is extremelly suspicious specially when it jumps so much betweeen the previous scores, this is simple logic, the average of the 95% of people that doesn't give the movie a 1 is almost an 8, people liked it, critics liked it, the movie is making a ton of money, it was a sucess in every sense despite what a tiny vocal minority says, is just as simple as that |
It's not a simple as that, you are trying to use one website as the end of all user reviews across the web when I clearly showed you it wasn't the case. The fact that this website, IMDB, is also trying to beef up the score by manipulating the average.
Rotten tomatoes, which is a bigger website where more people are actually writing their critics has the rating at 3.1/5, which mean 6.2/10, the lowest of any Star wars movie. The outside US and metacritic opinions are also very low, the lowest for a SW movie.
The truth is that people had high expectations before seeing this movie and most fans are leaving very disappointed. It's all over the place. People happy about the movie are mostly people with low expectations or very young people who would like any action movie. But among the Star Wars fans, it is by far the worst SW movie. That's how it is judged.
Soon, under 50% approval at Rotten tomatoes?
