By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryng_Tolu said:
DonFerrari said:

Sure... like all consoles that won generations dropped 85% on the next generation due to it not keeping its fanbase...

Sure PS2+X1, PS3+360 and PS4+X1 won't have similar numbers while GC->Wii->WiiU doesn't show a market that liked Wii and didn't care about gaming.

And if Wii demographic isn't one that didn't buy before and wouldn't buy later where does the blue ocean comes then? Are we rewriting history to keep the doom of consoles?

I can use this logic too. Look:

XBOX=24m -----> 360=90m --------> XB1=40-45m? (50m best scenario)

 

Sorry mate, you have no numbers to prove anything. And did  i ever called consoles doom or anything?

Gen 8 just was less popolar than gen 7, which is A FACT, and does not mean the industry is doomed.

In what world you did forget that Xbox and Playstation dispute a similar marketshare while Nintendon't?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."