Veknoid_Outcast said:
True that. Superhero movies in general have a villain problem but it’s especially pronounced in the MCU. After Loki it just falls off a cliff. I guess Pierce and Toomes are good too, but nothing spectacular. I think Civil War was Disney/Marvel saying to themselves “we have no good bad guys, so let’s just have them fight each other.” |
I think the quality of the villain is how much you invest into it. Look at Hackman and Nicholson. They got top billing over the hero of their films (which admittedly was due to star power and therefore led to bigger paychecks) and so the film spends almost as much time with them as the hero. Now the villain tends to be one small piece in the hero’s story. Loki benefits both from spending more than one film with him and also better writers writing for him and giving Hiddlleston a chance to cut loose. Obviously we’ll dive into this more as we go on, but it just seems Marvel has its successful formula and that does not include a villain that potentially outshines the hero