Female Leads RULE the Box Office

[pokoko]

SpokenTruth said:

pokoko said:

You probably shouldn't talk about logical fallacies and then build an elaborate rationalization that seeks to stereotype billions of people while sweeping every criticism of a complex issue under a convenient and all-encompassing rug.  It just adds to the silliness.

Fair but the "some" men is implied.  Do we really need a "not all men" here?  The only thing that is silly is ignoring an issue because you disagree that the issue even exists when those maligned by it have tried to correct it since the beginning of modern society.

If person A gets punched and they say it hurts.  Person B can't say, "I disagree.  I don't think that punch hurts you." or "I don't think that punch exists".  For whatever reason, "some" segment of the people from person B's group are ignoring person A and giving person B just as much weight (realistically, they are giving them more weight) to the question of whether the punch hurt person A or not.

The mere fact person B denies the issue is itself a problem person A must content with....constantly. 

That's still so simplified as to be a caricature of reality.  

You can't reduce humanity into two people.  There are millions of women and men in the world, many of whom only consider the world from their own perspective.  All conflicts have to be considered independently.  

If the goal is balance and equality then those who push too hard on either are all in the wrong.