DonFerrari said:
ebw said:
No, "fond of children" gives a perfectly reasonable impression when taken literally. It's only when you read it ironically that something menacing comes out it. A common phrase in English is "I'm not fond of children", but people never use that to mean "I deny being a pedophile", just "I find children more annoying than adorable". Someone who is clearly foreign to English is less likely to write something intended to be read in that way. I wouldn't be surprised if it's more than a little racist. It would be like some guy saying "I love cats!" and people think he loves to eat cats because he's from China or whatever.
|
I agree.
I do love children. I love my son, I love my nieces and nephews. I like to see pretty youngsters from 3 to 10 and their cute traces.
Same with being fond. When children aren't being crazy bulldozers I'm fond of them.
Probably it's western stupidity that think love is directly sexual.
We also should jail all teachers, nurses, pediatrics and others that threat child and love them, they are all clearly rapists...
CrazyGamer2017 said:
What a nice moralistic statement, quite in contrast with what you said in that other thread about Israel/Palestine, where your solution is to murder every last man woman and child to solve the conflict. But hey don't let that stuff you said over there be a smudge on your profound wisdom.
As an excerpt here is your answer to someone else who seems to have the same mind set as you in that other thread:
User was moderated for this post
-Super_Boom
|
You see... being SFW with the authority on moral grounds allow you to decide what is acceptable or not, got it?
OdinHades said:
Dear gawd. When I was 18 my girlfriend was 16. Should I turn myself in or kill me right away?
|
You should be terminated.
AlfredoTurkey said:
If that's the case, then yeah... it's pretty sick.
|
Except there is 0 sexual content.
|
That doesn't exempt the motive.
