By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lawlight said:
MDMAlliance said:

As with many things, it's a little more complicated:
But in follow-up reporting, The New York Times cited “a few” CDC officials who suggested the move was not meant as an outright ban, but rather, a technique to help secure Republican approval of the 2019 budget by eliminating certain words and phrases.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/cdc-director-says-there-are-no-banned-words-at-the-agency

Will TC respond to this? Because so far, he hasn’t corrected this thread.

My bad Lawlight I forgot about this thread.

 

anyway, as of now it’s a developing story, and the Democratic Party is asking for a proper explanation behind this. With conflicting reports, I’m wondering if they’re saying they’ll still use the terms regardless, or if there was a misunderstanding

 

something like this Is serious. It’s past politics - this can potentially prevent lives from being saved