Edellus on 16 December 2017
It's quite a read, and having read the first page, at least, it states that it counts for mostly repeated claims. These "claims" include backtracks, disagreements with experts (probabilities), "exaggerations", what Trump considers remarkable (and someone at the TWP doesn't), between others, according to The Washington Post.
These, are very broad and mostly interpretative and or debatable PoVs that, in my opinion, would be an hyperbole to just call them all as "lies" or "misleads".
Just one example that is counted as a "false or misleading claim":
There are plenty more of that type in that database. Personally, I can't take this database seriously, if that type of remark and that type of "rebutal" is considered "fact checking".
