By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TallSilhouette said:
Aeolus451 said:

An appeal towards emotions?  It's better for people in general. It's not about one little group. It's the whole that matters. Is it a net positive for most people? Good. I'm fine with that.

Stating statistical consequences of said plans is an appeal toward emotions? Tens of millions of people is one little group? A literal deficit is a net positive?

???

ou're only stating "consequences" in a way that a appeals toward emotions. Oh poor people. Oh sickly people. *shrugs Even if we're actually talking about tens of millions of people, it's relatively small compared to the overall population. I doubt that it's tens of millions of people though. Most of the people that would happen to would have to pay a bit more for coverage or get it through their employer. It's not end of the world. They want to get rid of that because it's putting the extra cost on healthier people. People should pay for their own shit in principal and in most cases. The left in the states has no business talking about deficits. Trump pulled the US out of the paris accord which saved the US at least 2.5 trillion dollars.