GhaudePhaede010 said:
No, it is not. If the games are bad, more of them is not a good thing. Look at how people treat the Wii. More games does not save its reputation. I guess if Capcom released 25 new games with the quality of Pit Fighter on SNES, that would make the console better, right? Not so fast on that one.
And in this case the score is literally 1 to 0. That is not much of an improvement; it is literally a 1 game improvement... not to mention the game looks bad and if it ends up not being any good, then its existence could actually hinder your point. Your point is simple, but the facts that surround it are not as black and white as you would like to suggest. I do think porting north of 40 titles and bringing only one new titles to a platform is harsh. I also think announcing you plan to port even more titles with nary a mention of even one more new title makes that situation even more so. I get that you do not see it the same way but I think Switch owners deserve to be treated better than this. I am not sure why you would think otherwise but you are entitled to your opinion. I mean, more games is better, right? So why would anyone argue with me when I say they should throw Switch owners another new game or two? |
Even there is possibility that there are some bad games, more games is always good thing because it's not like every game will be bad games you will definitely have some good games also. And games that Capcom unannounced are good games.
