Israel-Palestine: Which "solution" do you prefer?

[Jumpin]

spurgeonryan said:

Jumpin said:

Why shouldn't they be? Along with the Persian nations, they have received the burden of several million refugees thanks to militant Israeli immigration. Jordan is pretty close to bursting into nationalism due to the Palestinian refugee crisis along with the addition of the Syrian and Iraqi crisis that began with the US invasion of Iraq.

This is all their fight.

I agree to leave Saudi Arabia out of it, they don't take refugees, they just bomb them.

I can imagine if Israel ceases to exist they will get many more refugees as will the world. Too many upset people,  you need to have people that have nothing invested in the decision to make the choice. As people said,  whether it is 2,000 years or 68, it is a long time to fight about something. Many have grown and died fighting this battle. 

Allowing unrelated parties would be a terrible idea. First of all, that is how the situation began. The people who got together to create Israel didn't give any thought to the native peoples of the region, who had been there for thousands of years to make way for the immigration of millions of foreigners based solely on what religion they belonged to. They kicked them out of their homes, forced them into poverty, refugee camps, and gangs.  of the native population to allow for the unrestricted immigration of millions of foreigners. If experts, and people who actually had a stake in the lands, there wouldn't be the problems we have today; the resulting mass poverty, homelessness, and the worst refugee crisis of the 20th and 21st centuries, an, at this rate, the 22nd century as well.

You can't have peace when negotiation isn't part of the process. Anyone not treated favourably is not going to find it acceptable, and ultimately it will fail.