Israel-Palestine: Which "solution" do you prefer?

[Aeolus451]

deskpro2k3 said:

Aeolus451 said:

You have that backwards. The palestinians would be the ones to do that sort of stuff. They have their own terrorist groups dedicated to killing jews and destroying Israel. They advocate for violence and commit violence at every turn while the jews just want to be left alone. If it were to become a whole Israel, the jews would let anyone access to the holy sites while not attacking them or anything. While history clearly shows what happens when palestinians are in control of those places. In the long term, a whole Israel is the best choice. 

 

You have that backwards.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/07/israels-new-justice-minister-considers-all-palestinians-to-be-the-enemy/

Israeli justice minister, Ayelet Shaked says "mothers of all Palestinians should also be killed." She's clearly advocating for violence and genocide.

Even before all this mess, what about the Israeli terrorism against the British. https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-opens-secret-files-about-jewish-terrorists-in-1940s/

Oh the 1940s? You had to dig deep for that nugget.

I'm pretty sure that Palestinians have said and done worse. Again, it's best if Israelis control the area. They are the least likely to kill people.