By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
Aeolus451 said:

I think that's you're missing Azzanation's point. There's a growing pro-pedophilia movement that's trying to ride the coattails of LGBT (to be included in the umbrella term and become associated with that movement). There's also people who are into bestiality and incest that are also trying the same thing. They try to mirror any of the their talking points or slogans. The LGBT would be wise to counter that stuff. Alot of people are cool with gays and can accept them but there's a line with the other stuff. 

I am not missing his point.
Pedophilia, Beastiality and Incest have nothing to do with Homosexuality and thus should be treated as such.

Two of those things do not account for Adult consent and thus will NEVER be socially acceptable or legalized in Australian law.
Slippery slope logical fallacies should not be something that is taken seriously.

Yes, you are.

At the moment, pedophilia, bestiality and incest have nothing to do with gays but it will if those groups have their way. They want to be included in LGBT. It how's transsexualism and homosexuality have something to do with each other. Any acceptance of them or laws made on the behalf of LGBT is shared between the groups under that umbrella term. It's why they want to be included into it. I'm not really making a slippery slop argument. There's people that are pushing for pedophilia, bestiality and incest to being made legal and being socially acceptable by having them associated/treated the same as LGBT. If that happens, good luck getting anymore laws passed related to LGBT. 

I'll play the devil's advocate about the slippery slope not being a logical fallacy using what we're talking about. Yesterday, we were discussing accepting transsexuals, now we're talking about if trans-age, trans-racial, trans-species, non-binary, etc are a real thing. I'm not against transsexuals btw.