By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
monocle_layton on 10 December 2017
Edit Thread
-CraZed- said:
monocle_layton said:

Alright, I'm wrong. I assumed the experienced councilman would have more power (along with the article stating it was removed).

 

Is this dumb? Yes. However, I suppose I'll continue to disagree with anything I view as morally incorrect, regardless of who does it. If it makes me an SJW, then fuck it.  

 

Within a few months however I see this being removed. Not unreasonable to predict an increase in robbery and homicides in Philly soon

Respect.

I don't live caring what's right or wrong. I live knowing that even I make mistakes.

 

Being incorrect doesn't piss me off. The retarded 'hurr durr da leeburals and sjw's are back it' is what makes me despise any sort of conversation involving politics nowadays. Why can't we criticize a law, person, or event without going 'dem lefties/righties back at it' as though we have the mental capabilities of a five year old? 

 

The world hasn't gone mad. This is a law that is one of many other laws that will probably end up being removed eventually. This need to insert dramatized bullshit into anything to get these reactions is a problem. 

 

No idea why the councilwoman did this, but viewing her history she's done some decent things. Can't we post the article without inflating the doom and gloom?