By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ryuzaki57 said:
collint0101 said:  After Sony paid to keep mh world off of the switch I really don't give a damn. If the other companies are going to play dirty so should nintendo

Obviously Switch cannot run MHW. Capcom (wisely) chose PS4/X1 because the potential market was bigger and because they needed more powerful hardware to make the series go forward.

VGPolyglot said:  The gaming industry isn't democratic, I have no idea why you're even bringing that up.

Of course it is. PS4 has the largest userbase, then it has the largest library and the most games in development. Any Switch 3rd party exclusive is against the will of the people. As OP of the Playstation Nation, do you really think it's fair that PS4 players are left out? How is this even legitimate?

So I’m guessing that, basing off this premise, if Sony were to secure an exclusive that would be nice to play on the Switch, you would say “get a PS4 then”? Then I’m more than glad games like Octopath Traveler, Bayo 3, NMH (sorta?), and SMT V are exclusive to Switch. Hell, I’m glad the 3DS was able to get games like MH, Yokai Watch, SMT, Etrian Odyssey, Ace Attorney, and Professor Layton as exclusives. :P You’re not gonna get everything on one console. That has been that way since the console wars of the 90s. Would it be nice to have everything in one console? Sure. But that isn’t possible since we have three competing first party companies making hardware and dealing with third parties.