| Teeqoz said: The groups we have data for imply a handheld bias. Should we just ignore the goups we have data for, because we are lacking data for other groups? Until Nintendo discloses any more data, we have to work with what Nintendo has given us. Our arguments is based on albeit limited data, while your argument is based on presumptions regarding the groups we have no data for. Do I think the Switch would have sold as well if it was just a handheld? No. However I think it would have done a lot worse if it lacked the handheld functionality compared to if it lacked the home console functionality. Hence I think the handheld form factor is of greater importance for the high sales than the home console functionality. |
Maybe you're having trouble understanding what the debate is here, you're arguing about two particular groups yes but the original argument is someone claiming handheld is driving sales more than anything else, in order to make that claim the usage of the middle group is required because right now you're just taking one minority group and trying to peddle that as proof an argument doesn't work that way you have to prove the vast majority use handheld mode more to say that is what is driving sales.
If that is not your argument then it brings up the question of why you're replying because that is what the whole debate is about and so far you have done nothing to debunk the point that its the overall hybrid concept that drives sales and the data backs this up right now you're just repeating the rhetoric of one minority group being bigger than another except that's not even the argument to begin with it's what is driving sales and making the platform competitive.
