Biggerboat1 said:
What are you even trying to say here? These conditions are nothing like what any sane person would put their OLED through... Throughout this thread all you've done is vent bile on OLED & owners thereof - it's like it makes you feel good or something... Your views are so imbalanced that even though it is pointed out to you that on the very same page you link to, the outlet actually recommend OLED as the best TV for gaming - that all you can do is immediately aim an unfounded statement that they don't understand the test... amazing! You could have actually, you know - engaged with his actual point... I've witnessed plenty of rabid fanboyism of console manufacturers but TV technology - really...? I can understand that you have an issue with the technology - fair enough, there are definitely pros & cons, but go back and read your comments and more importantly note the tone of them - there's something else going on there... |
Half of the logos that are burnt-in had run 2 hours on, 3.5 hours off. The VA and IPS running alongside the TV had no issue not burning in with even the torture tests, but the OLED can't even handle the gaming test.
Not only that, but the lower brightness is supposed to reduce burn-in, and it's been running with pixel shift active. OLED was given every opportunity to pass at least the standard 50% opacity test (10 minutes on, 2 minutes off), but it didn't.
Last edited by Azuren - on 28 November 2017Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames







