By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

I'm really not going to argue with you about this, sorry to disappoint. 

It's fine, it doesn't disapoint me.

Actually, yes I will. I'll be honest, I did write two different responses and erased them both.  And that's because I don't know what to tell you. It is quite annoying that you, quite often, make these "your opinion is objectively wrong!" kind of comments. I've seen them before on the site, some directed at me, I even saw it on your wall with Azure. I don't think you understand the irony in saying that film perception is just an opinion, and then going on to say an opinion is definitively wrong. That being said, I can also understand the perspective. I have probably said that before about something, and some day in the heat of a disagreement I'll probably say it again. It's an easy mentality to top when you are so secure in your opinion about how great something is. 

If you notice my original comment was not bashing the director and it seems you read it, but decided to ignore any positivity it had. I said in it that Pulp Fiction is great, but after watching it I feel like it is rather "meh". That is not me saying it is a definitively "meh" film, just that it feels that way afterwards. I liked Reservoir Dogs too and loved Hateful Eight. That's 3/5 of the films I've seen from him, and your response is to get triggered that I had an opinion. I really don't mean this in a rude way but, I do not see how you could read your last reply and not think that there was a better way to communicate it when it basically amounted to your average cliche hipster elitist response. 

You even edited your comment to say " same when saying that a guy that directed so many huge movies and which skills as a great director are so fucking evident is just a "meh" director, is just wrong, you may not like them, but that shouldn't make you unable to see its obvious virtues." Which is funny, because I literally said that I wanted to get into the director more and finish his discography. Why would I do that if I do not see the "virtues" in his films? I don't think he's a meh director by the way, the films I've seen from his discography just left me unimpressed. I've seen Pulp Fiction three times, so it is not like I am not genuinely trying. All I can say is that I hope I like his work more in the future, I would certainly described most of what I've seen as "good", but that's it. I really don't know what you want from me other than for me to say, I'll give it another go(even though I've seen Pulp 3 times)?