Alkibiádēs said:
Games and hardware are hardly the same thing. When manufacturing costs go down, so should the hardware itself. Hardly rocket science. Nothing wrong with price cuts on games either, but when major price cuts happen a month or two after launch it's not very healthy for the gaming industry in the long term (because they will try to make up the lost revenue in other ways like loot boxes and micro-transactions). |
Honestly, it seems your argument could be summed up as "Whatever Nintendo does is right." To me, it seems both models have a place in the industry and neither are really unhealthy. Personally, I would prefer Nintendo adopt the other model, since I would buy more of their games. I'm not paying near full price for a 2+ year old game. But, Nintendo seems to get away with it, so it doesn't really matter.
Jranation said:
Last time I checked this was "Amazon U.S thread" . Look at the yearly and monthly charts. |
And what's the number one selling console in the US this year? The PS4, you say. Cool. And if Sony has piled up enough stock, it looks like they may be keeping that crown.
Personally, I don't get the whole put the PS4 against the Switch at this point in time. Especially when fans of neither console just use it as a hit against the PS4 when their console of choice is faltering. They both are selling great. They both offer different experiences that consumers see value in. And neither seem to be hurting sales of the other. Sony rules home consoles. Nintendo rules handhelds. Period.







