By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:

And now that I bring this fact, then you will try and say that Fifa and skyrim are different games (no shit sherlock).

But based on the info we have right now we have Fifa Switch done bad in UK -> bad WW, and what Skyrim Switch have done (that is lower than PSVR, and in this case can't even use any excuse on userbase since PSVR userbase is smaller than Switch). So from what we have it is more likely to supposed based on data that Skyrim haven't done great number WW for Switch.

Using the UK of all countries as a litmus test for Skyrim Switch's performance worldwide is kinda pointless. The FIFA comparison is equally pointless as FIFA is a massively Eurocentric game and Skyrim is not. America will be the game's primary market, those are the numbers that really matter.

Qwark said:

Third party games dont sell well on Nintendo systems unless they are third party exclusives (rabbits). It has been that way since the gamecube era.

Plenty of non-exclusive third party games crossed the million mark on Wii.

litmus test? Where were all of you hidding when we were discussing the Fifa sales in UK and others were certain that WW sales of Fifa for Switch would be much better and that UK was the worse Nintendo territory (it isn't, the numbers of Switch sales in UK will be greater than most markets)...

Is those one of the situations where we deny all possibilities at all times until we can't deny it and then we forget?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."