Wyrdness said:
The problem with your argument is that having a certain component cost more stops being an issue when progression has made it that the cost of having it is a non issue a HDD or internal storage is an example of this it cost more to have it but now every platforms has it the same will happen to having a display so that's not really a concrete argument against progression. It can be the norm in the scenario he speculates because the is no real reason for it not to if the tech progress to the point in his speculation. This is why I'm asking about your reading, the PS4P portable performance level would be the cheaper option the more expensive option would be between that and PS5 performance going by the rate of progression today. |
PS4Port would be good for some. And even if the cost of a display is low it will exist and could be better used for other thing. I for one would preffer more power than handheld.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







