By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:

Are we in a world where displays and batteries have negative cost? Or in a world where making the chip smaller make it more powerfull as consequence? Nope, so there will always be a trade-off. And assuming that because you like the Switch concept it will automatically means it will take over the market is just like saying cellphone game will kill traditional consoles because you like candy crush.

What a strawman response you've got there as no one is talking about liking a concept we're talking about how well executed it is and the applications and the latter support his view hybrids can replace platforms in future. The are always trade offs but then the is progression and with progression the trade offs can become far less of an issue after all aren't many people playing on consoles instead of PCs despite trade offs? Why because the former does a good job in offering what the latter does.

Such a great trade off that like 1/3 of gaming HW or more are still PCs...

You are the one doing a strawman argument because to you it seems like the only possible outcome that hybrid becomes the norm and other forms of dedicate consoles cease to exist. Are you on the bandwagon that assumed PS4/X1 wouldn't have physical drive?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."