Wyrdness said:
You're trying to counter the argument by bringing up pro cameras, pro cameras at best in your argument are equivalent to cameras as PC gaming is to gaming it doesn't really back your point as the consoles are being compared to the non pro consumer industry which is a fraction of what it used to be because a new well executed concept has replaced it. A Hybrid can attend to all, the original user comes across as saying the form factor of the Switch could become the norm for all non PC platforms when tech begins to catch up and becomes viable and tbh he's right the's nothing a Hybrid platform wouldn't be able to do should tech catch up and become viable. |
Are we in a world where displays and batteries have negative cost? Or in a world where making the chip smaller make it more powerfull as consequence? Nope, so there will always be a trade-off. And assuming that because you like the Switch concept it will automatically means it will take over the market is just like saying cellphone game will kill traditional consoles because you like candy crush.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







