By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
Qwark said:

Sincere question here, is it so hard to keep it in your pants and not harras woman. I am pretty much asexual so I wouldn't know. Seems like some males (and some females) need to be taught they can only touch another with the out spoken consent of the other party. If not keep your grabby paws to yourself. Is it so fucking hard to do just that. Sure it kills spontaneous reactions, but it also prevents unwanted sexual harassment. I think the latter is more important than the first one.

 

"Seems like some males (and some females) need to be taught they can only touch another with the out spoken consent of the other party. "

this is not how sexual interaction works at all, its generally based on body language and can be ambiguous

 

"I am pretty much asexual so I wouldn't know"

if by your own admission you do not know, why try to give unrealistic guidelines?

1 (Bolded) By definition and imperial data that doesn't work all that well. Since there are 100.000 of cases sexual harassment per year in my country which only counts 17 million people. Hell we are at a point one in seven girls in their 20's is either raped or doesn't know the exact difference between rape and sexual harassment but has certainly experienced something sexually that she did not want too. 

2 Why should an asexual person give guidelines, mostly because asexual persons don't like physical contact all that much to begin with. Or even better I simply don't like people touching me without consent, even if it is a (hot) chick. Since asexual persons like me are probably the persons who like physical contact least, whatever would work for asexual people should surely work for sexual people, to prevent harassment. Obviously asexual persons and girls in particular can also be sexually harassed. 

Last edited by Qwark - on 18 November 2017

Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar