| Wright said: It's funny how repeatedly you try making it as I'm the one upset or rambling, when you're the one using the passive-aggresive tone and the selective way of replying to avoid touching certain topics. The epitome of it is writing "yawn" in a post forum. At least put it between asterisks if you're roleplaying a yawning, mate. Dunno, maybe you'd like having me upset or rambling, unfortunately that's not what's happening. I'm actually disappointed, hoping you'd provide an insightful conversation with the sources I was giving and you bringing up yours, but I guess it wasn't mean to be. I'm not sure how can it be disputed that Bethesda isn't all that "straight talking" when you've seen Hines going a bit in circles himself. In case you need me to specifically point out to it, he said that Skyrim had to remain specifically as it was designed, but there was a possibility of it happening on WiiU. I already gave you WiiU's architecture and a link to it which can totally make Skyrim work (especially bearing in mind WiiU's third party performance on it), but Hynes said that the hardware an issue. And now here comes Skyrim Switch, which even features joy-con support (something that wasn't even designed originally). It's easy to tell where Hynes, which is responsible of the PR department, can't clear up his mind, or how things change once Bethesda has in its hands a Nintendo console where they see the sales potential. You also bring a point that I've been trying to call out all along: Which would mean Bethesda wasn't "straight talking" about WiiU's hardware; they just didn't find money viability and used hardware as an excuse instead of telling the truth, not unlike some devs with the WiiU as well. Also, let's exercise some pragmatism, why not? So does Capcom's statement in this very thread we're replying to each other. |
Yeah yeah you can sure hear the tone of my voice across the internet, I wrote yawn as it's tiring reading you get on edge because you're being replied to a prime example is your previous post on how your time is precious blah blah trying to go for some moral high ground yet here you are again that's what the yawn is for because I've seen it all before, the whole tone thing is in your head because mentally you're perceiving responses as being attacks I'm just not bothered to try and convince you otherwise as you already made your mind up. Passive aggressive claim and all that yet earlier you're trying to make sweeping statements on people giving Bethesda a free pass and just hating on Capcom despite being shown how the effort differs in your own words it's displaced anger, I'll address you the same way you come across.
Read the link you posted Hines was straight talking he said it's possible but went on further to say that it could still be quite a bit of work to get running on another platform which itself doesn't guarantee release even if its possible, you're going on about me cherry picking but the Hines argument ironically shows you cherry picking the hardware comment was even in reference to a different game and at the time they were working on Fallout 4 so yes hardware would have been an issue he's not wrong there. Skyrim on Switch is the Remaster release on PS4 and X1 so I don't see your point here Switch has familiar architecture that reduces the work load Hines was highlighting back then.
Clarify the last line as it's not very clear what you're asking, we'll start the argument a fresh from this point on.
