Wright said:
I posted in the other reply: It doesn't matter, because it caused struggle within people. You think it might be clear that they were on board, but not everyone was as happy, especially when people didn't buy things from other developers like "unprecedent support" from EA in regards to the Nintendo Switch. People simply were cautious because there was no real reason to think Bethesda would carry on a great support, in lights of their comments afterwards. No previous history (sans two Wii game published back in 2008) also made it easier to think Bethesda could cop out at any point. The current mismanagement of EA as support goes on Switch hasn't surprised people, after all. And I'm not sure what difference I have to see there. 3 Big AAA games, two of those being games from previous years (sure, Doom is fairly recent, but one dates back of 2011!). Considering Capcom hasn't released any AAA game sans Resident Evil 7 in recent years, which I already mentioned on the other reply, again, what does people want? AAA games out of thin air that don't even exist in other platforms? You'd be happy if they ported Resident Evil 4, which was an AAA back in the day, just like Skyrim was in 2011? Capcom just said they're developing Switch games, one of them including Ace Attorney. What else is there at this point? |
Its not point if people were happy or not, that didn't depended from Bethesda if they are under NDA, they can't say anything specifk until Nintendo don't approve them.
It doesn't matter (just for record Skyrim Remaster is game from last year also), 3 AAA big games are still 3 AAA big games more compared to Capcom, Capcom did not announced nothing similar, not single one, if Capcom for instance just announced RE7 (so just one big AAA game) people would act quite difrent to Capcom regardless Switch support. So it very obvious why Bethesda get praise and Capcom is criticized.