Ka-pi96 said:
Using archaic and outdated terms is easier than using more descriptive terms that people actually understand? I just hope it's mostly old people that use those terms then and that they'll be phased out as they move on. For your Mata example I think saying he should be playing an attacking midfield or second striker role makes much more sense and is easier to understand that saying a #10 role. Especially since as far as I'm aware the #10 is usually associated with a teams top goalscorer (eg. Kane, Aguero etc). |
The thing is it's difficult to define positions when they're changing all the time. A full-back crossing into the box regularly would've been unheard of not that long ago.
The idea of these 'roles' in football being given numbers makes sense. Saying you're gonna moves a centre back into the 6 role is just easy.
And the Number 9 is still predominantly the main striker. Benzema, Lukaku, Cavani, Lewandowski, Aubameyang, Suarez, Falcao, Morata, Belotti etc etc.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'







