By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shaunodon said:
DonFerrari said:

Yet you said it wasn't very good. And I pointed that not being ideal is different than not being good.

How often are you going to move the goal post?
You literally moved it in this one reply from 'not very good' to 'not good' period.

What I said in my original reply was "not a great place for middle-range games". You don't have to be great to be successful, however it's not the same as being ideal.

So ideal and great meant the same thing? You are the one moving the goal post for it to try and fit a narrative on their report.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."