Miyamotoo said:
Conspiracy!? :D If we talk about 3rd parties, It's always about interest, nothing more and nothing less. |
Well people think there is a conspiracy to burn Nintendo to the ground and not support it... so with all the reports this week can we assume there is a conspiracy against MS and Sony because they are talking about supporting Switch and not X1 and PS4?
freebs2 said:
If you have middle range productions it does make sense to support a platform where you don't have to compete with large scale productions. The 3DS had techincal limitations, the WiiU didn't have the userbase. The switch on the other end... |
Sure it makes sense to support Switch. If you have the genres or games that sell good on Switch and its userbase is enough or if you can port to there it's sensible to launch games on it...
But for some reason when companies doesn't launch games they don't think will bring money then they are all conspiracing against Nintendo.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







