AngryLittleAlchemist said:
It makes no sense though. It discriminates against games that don't have a story and focus on multiplayer ... even if that's the point of the game |
It does make sense, you just don't agree with it (which is fine). This is what is important to me. I understand this is a minority view, but story is the most important. There are others who feel this way based on the dozens of past reviews I've put on this website, though I know we are the minority. I wanted to offer a different perspective. However, as I mentioned in the review, I include a score that shows what it is without taking story into consideration, which was in the 70s for this game.







