By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SvennoJ said:
konnichiwa said:

But honestly it is not so bad for games,  Don't take 4k movies around 100 GB? I remember one of the first 4K movies surpassing 150 GB.

Netflix streams them at around 18 mbps with HDR, that's 7.9 GB per hour or 16GB for a 2 hour movie.
4K UHD discs can hold upto 100GB Not all of that is for the movie as it includes multiple soundtracks and extras.

The first 4K movie was 330GB for a 52 minute movie in 4096x2304 12 bit cineform format.
https://secure.timescapes.org/products/purchase.aspx?&pai=182163&token=F0A2B8
4K UHD is still very lossy compressed compared to that, that file runs at over 800 mbps, compared to max 128 mbps for 4K UHD discs.

It wouldn't be so bad for games if they came on 4K UHD discs, and installed to a 2Tb SSD drive :)

At some point we may truly get to sound and pixelcount that is already "all we need"



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."