Nintendo should teach their 3rd party supporters their file compression secrets.

[Zekkyou]

Alkibiádēs said:

Zekkyou said:

You know what isn't? The 360 version. Honestly Nintendo should just delete all trace of XCX to hide their shame.

You know what's even worse?

BotW: 13GB
GTA3: 1GB

Amazing how far Rockstar has fallen. They used to be 13 times better than Nintendo, now look at them. *shakes head sadly*

I'm making comparisons that make sense, you're just making non-sensical or even false comparisons. 

Aren't you a mod?

Compare BotW with something like Skyrim on the Switch, then we'll talk (it's around 14 GB which is acceptable, but then again, Bethesda has been the only major third party publisher that has made an effort with releasing decent games for the Switch). 

Some might say i'm make an intentionally ridiculous comparison in response to someone who dismisses any points they can't objectively respond to, and who opts to shift the discussion rather than address basic concepts like 'more complex graphics result in larger files sizes', but i assure you, those people couldn't be further from the truth.

Now if you'll excuse me, i need to make a thread angrily questioning why i have to sit around waiting for a 5.7GB SMO download when M64 was only 54MB. It's insulting behaviour from Nintendo.