By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Alkibiádēs said:
Zekkyou said:

You know what isn't? The 360 version. Honestly Nintendo should just delete all trace of XCX to hide their shame.

You know what's even worse?

BotW: 13GB
GTA3: 1GB

Amazing how far Rockstar has fallen. They used to be 13 times better than Nintendo, now look at them. *shakes head sadly*

I'm making comparisons that make sense, you're just making non-sensical or even false comparisons. 

Aren't you a mod?

Compare BotW with something like Skyrim on the Switch, then we'll talk (it's around 14 GB which is acceptable, but then again, Bethesda has been the only major third party publisher that has made an effort with releasing decent games for the Switch). 

Why does this comparison doesn't make sense and OP and yours make?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."