By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo said:
DonFerrari said:

No problem you preffering the 10m game, but if they are making 80% profit (8M profiting after 2M break even) I would appreciate the game costing like half and they breaking even on 4M and profiting on the 6M.

They dont have any reason to sell Zelda BotW at lower price, its not how it works, I mean Mario Odyssey that has carton graphics and no voice acting, and for instance The Last Of US 2 that have cast and voice acting like some move and realistic graphics, will have same price point of $60, despite differences they are still both AAA games.

And that is the main reason I don't support Nintendo and think they are the ones that abuse most their userbase.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."