Miyamotoo said:
Well Nintendo is only gaming company compared to Sony and MS that have other divisons that could help them, and they always are going for high profit because gaming is everything they are doing, I mean Wii U and 3DS are all Nintendo consoles that were not selling with profit right from launch. |
I have nothing against Nintendo doing good and making profit. My only issue is people criticizing AAA putting 100M on a game to sell 10M and make good profit versus Nintendo puting 10M and selling 15M at the same pricetag, asking the others to better manage their budget.
To me a 30% margin is more than decent, if a company is making much more than that, then they should be investing that in making even better things for me, or charge less.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
