By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said:

And here we are at X1 and PS4 both having mandatory installs of 50Gb of content.

I had no issue managing a 100 catalogue with 160Gb on PS3, and even had several downloaded games from PSN+. You can keep about 10 games on the HDD at all times and most people don't really game all those at once, and most buy less than 10 on a gen

160GB is a lot more than the no HDD/12GB/20GB that a few of the 360 and PS3 SKUs had.

But it's really going off-topic now. Yes, some Xbox fans said mean things, but maybe you should make a dedicated vendetta thread for those things (and include Nintendo) instead of ranting in various threads.

PS3 launched with a 20 or 40GB (I don't even remember anymore) and most installs didn't take the full size of the BD, I remember most being bellow 4GB at the time.

I rant all the time, and response threads are against the rules here.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."