By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope... when you install all games there is very little difference between optional and mandatory. I have issue with people that criticize one action only depending on the one making it.

The difference between optional and mandatory is that the former gives gamers a choice. There are 360 and PS3 SKUs with small HDDs, so a growing number of games with mandatory installs necessitates HDD space management on a regular basis. Wii U is in the same boat; mandatory installs would have been painful, but there are really only two games with optional installs on the system (XCX and BotW).

And here we are at X1 and PS4 both having mandatory installs of 50Gb of content.

I had no issue managing a 100 catalogue with 160Gb on PS3, and even had several downloaded games from PSN+. You can keep about 10 games on the HDD at all times and most people don't really game all those at once, and most buy less than 10 on a gen



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."