By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo said:
DonFerrari said:

Almost anything can be constantly found below MSRP, even Switch, crazy isn't it?

You have trying to deflect the fact that PS4 had little PRICECUT since the begining and still haven't conceded.

It may be, may not be. Why would one think Sony would wait for sales to decrease severely before cutting the price? Sony said multiple times they weren't cutting the price at that the moment because the sales were good (they are still being up YOY since the begining of the gen) and Kaz said also that the main focus of PS was to increase userbase. So I have little reason to doubt they will cut it at the right moment to increase sales and not only to counter a plummeting.

I went from 299 to 199, why not? Does the fact that PS4 launched at 399 and had 2 pricecuts of 50 make a 100 pricecut impossible?

Funny enough when another poster answered to you to have the pricecut at 199 you pretended it would still not have a sales spike. Why would Sony make a pricecut to 249 that is what the deals are already selling at? They would only if the need for a cut is small enough. If they can increase again just by going to 249 they will, and that will make it even more likely that they will later go for 199 and not peak at 249.

It can, but there is difference when something can be, and when something regularly is for quiet time now.

We dont know that, I said maybe, you cant be sure that year with price cut will be peak year for PS4.

It's not impossible, but going from $300 to $200 is not usually, but maybe they will because you can for quite time now almost everywhere buy PS4 below $300.

And I will again say, price cut doesn't automatically means peak year in sales.

You love to discuss what isn't being said to deflect from what was said right?

If the system with stock shortages can get deals in less than 6 months, it will become common very fast. Go daily search around the globe and I'm sure you'll find deals every week.

We don't, but the way you phrase it you make like it's less likely to be up. It's unusual to cut from 299 to 199 because you said so? You had any issues with MS cuting from 499 to 399 and to 299?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."