Miyamotoo said:
It can, but there is difference when something can be, and when something regularly is for quiet time now. We dont know that, I said maybe, you cant be sure that year with price cut will be peak year for PS4. It's not impossible, but going from $300 to $200 is not usually, but maybe they will because you can for quite time now almost everywhere buy PS4 below $300. And I will again say, price cut doesn't automatically means peak year in sales. |
You love to discuss what isn't being said to deflect from what was said right?
If the system with stock shortages can get deals in less than 6 months, it will become common very fast. Go daily search around the globe and I'm sure you'll find deals every week.
We don't, but the way you phrase it you make like it's less likely to be up. It's unusual to cut from 299 to 199 because you said so? You had any issues with MS cuting from 499 to 399 and to 299?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







