By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo said:
DonFerrari said:

And you suddenly compared that to Switch that just released... and when showed it can already be bought for less you started not believing.

And again X1 could be bought for less than MSRP very close to launch, no one called that a pricecut.

Also as other provided you when pricecuts are announced the deals will also get lower.

The sales of PS4 are most likely to rise once it get to 199.

But I also didnt call that pricecut, I just bringed obvous (despite ofical price of $300 you can regulary (you constantly have sales and deals for PS4) buy PS4 at lower price point or much higher value bundle for same MSRP of $300, and thats a fact). :)

In moment of price cut it will raise offcourse, but before that price cut sales will maybe already be in decline so price cut doesn't mean it will sell better than this year.

Also you went from MSRP $300 to $199. :)

Almost anything can be constantly found below MSRP, even Switch, crazy isn't it?

You have trying to deflect the fact that PS4 had little PRICECUT since the begining and still haven't conceded.

It may be, may not be. Why would one think Sony would wait for sales to decrease severely before cutting the price? Sony said multiple times they weren't cutting the price at that the moment because the sales were good (they are still being up YOY since the begining of the gen) and Kaz said also that the main focus of PS was to increase userbase. So I have little reason to doubt they will cut it at the right moment to increase sales and not only to counter a plummeting.

I went from 299 to 199, why not? Does the fact that PS4 launched at 399 and had 2 pricecuts of 50 make a 100 pricecut impossible?

Funny enough when another poster answered to you to have the pricecut at 199 you pretended it would still not have a sales spike. Why would Sony make a pricecut to 249 that is what the deals are already selling at? They would only if the need for a cut is small enough. If they can increase again just by going to 249 they will, and that will make it even more likely that they will later go for 199 and not peak at 249.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."