| SpokenTruth said: No, they are not. It also doubles as a great home console. Marketing expenses are not greater than during Wii U era. Check their financials. The message is just better. Sales are up, revenue is up, profits are up, marketing costs are pretty much flat. |
Sorry but a home console from 2017 with the power of the boosted ps3 that didnt even come with a decent controller for home console play while the ps4 (way stronger, better lineup) is around 250$ isnt a great home console.
If your looking for a home console only and dont like/need the mobility factor + arnt a big nintendo fan (who wouldve bought the new nintendo system no matter what), there really isnt any logical reason to get this system over a ps4.
If you like the possibility to use it on the go its great (strongest handheld currently) but if you arnt interested in it, this is just not your console.
I dont know about their marketing budgets but if they really pay the same as for the wii u they defiitly screwed the wii u up heavily. The wii u had almost no adds, there was no super bowl add and i know many gamers that didnt even know about the wiiu for several years. The switch is handled alot better.
