| Ka-pi96 said: It's actually a fact. If it weren't then it would literally be impossible to have a discussion about sex without it including minors. Since it's absolutely not necessary to include minors in a discussion about sex, saying it's not needed is clearly true... |
Ok to be honest here, there's a million things that could be said on this topic. I totally disagree with you for a lot of reasons.
Also I think you have the wording wrong. Technically NOTHING is absolutely "necessary" to be included into anything.
It is not necessary to add sugar in water to hydrate yourself but that does not mean that adding sugar changes the fact that when drinking that water you are still hydrating yourself.
Curl-6 has one point that is correct: This thread is NOT about this topic, it's only about people having had sex in the past year. So discussing this is slightly off-topic. So you should not have said what you just said cause that invites to further discussing this. And don't get me wrong, I don't mind debating this issue as mankind does not bring progress out of ignoring issues but out of tackling them and there's a lot of ignorance regarding this issue. But honestly I don't feel like opening a thread that will have such a high level of controversy and that will probably be closed in the end. If someone else opens it and the thread is allowed I might join the debate, if not then fine too.
